Apple could bar ‘Fortnite’ from App Store, rules U.S. judge

App Store

Epic sued Apple in August, claiming that the company’s 30% commission on some in-app purchases made through its App Store, constituted anticompetitive behaviour

A federal judge in California on Friday ruled in an injunction request that Apple Inc could bar Epic Games’ “Fortnite” from its App Store but must not harm Epic’s developer tools business, which includes the “Unreal Engine” software used by hundreds of other video games.

The Court maintains its findings from the temporary restraining order and hereby grants in part and denies in part Epic Games’ motion for a preliminary injunction, District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled.

Last month, Epic Games had filed for a preliminary injunction that would put its game back in the App Store and restore its developer account after the iPhone maker terminated Epic Games’ account on its App Store.

Epic sued Apple in August, claiming that the company’s 30% commission on some in-app purchases made through its App Store, combined with Apple’s controls over what apps users can download to their iPhones, constituted anticompetitive behaviour. The lawsuit came after Epic rolled out its own payment system in the popular Fortnite video game.

Apple does not allow such alternative payment systems and removed Fortnite from the App Store and threatened to terminate Epic’s developer accounts, which would have affected Epic’s other business of selling software used to create games.

Epic moved to stop Apple from taking both steps. The judge previously issued an emergency order that allowed Apple to pull Epic’s titles from the App Store but barred the iPhone maker from taking any action that would harm Epic’s developer tools.

Epic Games has strong arguments regarding Apple’s exclusive distribution through the iOS App Store, and the in-app purchase (“IAP”) system through which Apple takes 30% of certain IAP payments, the judge said in Friday’s ruling.

However, she added that Epic Games has not sufficiently addressed Apple’s counter arguments. She said, the equities, addressed in the temporary restraining order, remain the same.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of Scommerce. The information provided on Scommerce is intended for informational purposes only. Scommerce is not liable for any financial losses incurred. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions.

scommerce

Welcome! Get free access to EVERYTHING we publish…

Whether you are an investor, tech enthusiast, or entrepreneur we have something for you. You'll get our FREE weekly newsletter with latest news and information along with special offers. Please take time to read our privacy policy. The information you provide us will be processed in accordance with this.